Plan requirement
| Subscription | Suite Growth or higher |
| Also required | Copilot |
| Access | Admin |
Help with configuration work: describing what you want and getting a proposed change instead of a settings hunt.
What it does
You describe the outcome in ordinary language, and it proposes the configuration: a trigger, a view, a field, a routing rule. You review the proposal and decide.
Where it helps most
- Things you do rarely. Building a trigger once a quarter means relearning the conditions each time.
- Finding where a setting lives in an interface with a great many screens.
- Explaining existing configuration, particularly one somebody else built.
The last one is underrated
Inheriting an account with forty triggers nobody documented is a common situation. Being able to ask what a trigger does, and what would happen if you disabled it, is worth more than building new ones quickly.
You still approve
Nothing is applied without you agreeing. That matters more here than with agent-facing features, because configuration changes affect everybody at once and some of them are awkward to unpick.
Review the proposal properly
A proposed trigger can be right in intent and wrong in scope: the correct action with a condition that catches more tickets than you meant. Read what it will match, not only what it will do.
It does not know your business
It knows Zendesk. Whether a change is a good idea for your organisation, and whether it conflicts with something you agreed last year, is still your judgement.
Comments
0 comments
Article is closed for comments.