Plan requirement
| Subscription | Suite Enterprise or higher, Explore Enterprise |
| Access | Admin |
Filtering a report with a query for cases the ordinary filters cannot express. Powerful, and rarely the right first answer.
Use it
- Open the report.
- Add a query-based filter.
- Write the condition.
- Compare the row count before and after.
- Save, and write down what the query does.
Try the ordinary filters first
Most requirements that feel like they need a query are a filter plus a calculated attribute. That combination is easier to read, easier to change, and visible to somebody who did not build it.
Where a query genuinely helps
- Comparing two fields against each other rather than against a value.
- Conditions involving several fields in a way the filter interface cannot express.
- Selecting a specific set of records for a one-off investigation.
It becomes invisible
A query filter is not obvious to anybody opening the report later. They see a number and no reason for it, and the reason is hidden inside a filter they may not think to open.
Put the condition in the report title or a caption.
Check the effect on the count
Before and after, every time. A query with a subtle error still runs and returns a smaller, plausible number.
It is fragile
A field renamed or a value changed elsewhere breaks the query silently. Anything built on one needs rechecking after configuration changes.
Prefer one place
If several reports need the same condition, put it into a calculated attribute on the dataset instead and filter on that. One definition, changed in one place.
Comments
0 comments
Article is closed for comments.